Synthesis Diagnostic

January 25, 2023

Synthesis Diagnostic

Order Number	6897456364557
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Synthesis Diagnostic

For this paper, state a clear, concise, and contentious thesis dealing with the impact of a recent (post-2015) or imminent innovation. Your innovation could be related to the Arts and Humanities, Business, Education, Engineering, the Health Sciences, the Sciences, or the Social Sciences. Your paper should make a claim on whether you think this innovation is beneficial and/or harmful and explore. There is one exception: NO ELECTRIC VEHICLES.

For this assignment, you will write a paper at least 500 words long. Be sure to submit this draft via Canvas as a file entry. Note that this paper is a diagnostic, so the grading will be lenient and you will have an opportunity to revise for a better grade. The word synthesis means to bring ideas together to form something new – like a new theory or a research question. YOU MUST INCLUDE AT LEAST TWO CRITICAL SOURCES.

You will structure your paper as follows:

INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPHS: Introduce the topic in one or two paragraphs and lay out the technology you’re discussing, including a brief overview of the pros and cons, and then state a clear, concise thesis. You want to clearly define the field(s) that this topic belongs to and any relevant terms, but don’t run too far over a page.

BODY PARAGRAPHS: Lay out the benefits and drawbacks of the technology as it relates to the discipline you’re discussing. Then, using logic and other sources, try to come down clearly as either for or against the technology. Some nuance is permitted in your answer, but the firmer your position, the more persuasive most readers will find it. The focus here is on mediating a synthesis conversation between these sources using your own intellect, logic, and research; you should follow this mediation with a clear verdict and recommendation on the technology.

CONCLUDING PARAGRAPHS: This is where you will present the insights, or “so what,” regarding this synthesis. What was learned by bringing the articles together in conversation? You want to move to the new things that can be concluded due to the synthesis and, ultimately, present a direction for future research or legislation. Where can future research go? What are the implications of your argument? How might your argument apply to other areas of interest in this or other disciplines?

Minimum words: 500

[Order Now]

Synthesis Diagnostic

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.