SYD 3800 Sociology of Sex and Gender

November 28, 2022

SYD 3800 Sociology of Sex and Gender

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

SYD 3800 Sociology of Sex and Gender

[Order Now]

For this assignment, you’ll need to find one sexual health artifact – that is, a human-made object relating in some way to men’s or women’s sexual health. Note that the objects could relate to reproduction (either facilitating or preventing it) or to sexual health more generally. Here are a few examples, but there are numerous others you could examine – the packaging of any sort of contraception (for women or men), any product related to pre-conception or pregnancy, a flyer or ad for such products, a pamphlet from a reproductive health clinic, sperm bank, or egg donation facility, or an ad for a product related to sexual performance or health. Upload a photo of the artifact with your post (using “embed image” option), and answer the following questions. Please note that images you find online are just fine!

Describe your artifact. What is it? Who is it targeting? (Not only gender but also other categories like age, race, or class may be relevant to your item.) What language or images are used? (40 points)

Analyze your artifact as a gendered product. Here are some questions that are likely to be relevant to your item: How does it reflect the social construction of gender? Sexuality as a gendered phenomenon? What are its messages about the role of women versus men in contraception, reproduction, or sexual relationships more generally? (40 points)

[Order Now]

Reply to at least one other participant’s post. Be sure your reply adds to the discussion in a substantive way. (For example, you’d want to say something more than just “I agree” or “I’ve seen that, too!”) (20 points)

*Please note that this discussion, like the others, requires you to analyze something using a sociological perspective. It does not ask for opinions, beliefs, or judgments. For example, statements about whether people should or should not engage in X or Y behavior have no place in the discussion, as answering normative questions like these isn’t our goal. If you have any questions about your artifact or analysis of it, please let me or your mentor know. We are happy to help!

SYD 3800 Sociology of Sex and Gender

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.