Support Pursuit of A Biopharmaceutical Product Essay

December 2, 2022

Support Pursuit of A Biopharmaceutical Product Essay

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Support Pursuit of A Biopharmaceutical Product Essay

[Order Now]

commercialization of a biomedical product involves consideration of many variables unique to the healthcare sector including financial, technical, legal, regulatory, manufacturing, and marketing concerns. A major objective for the course is to give students an opportunity to translate regulatory requirements for medicinal products into broadly applicable regulatory strategies and submissions. This necessarily involves practicing analytical thinking, and effective communication of scientific and technical information. In completing this Assignment students will have the opportunity to use these skills to demonstrate their understanding of the concepts involved in constructing a lifecycle management strategy for a new class of biopharmaceutical products.

Instructions

Utilize the following case study to evaluate and communicate your thinking on developing a compliant life-cycle management strategy:
Imagine that you, as a regulatory science expert, go camping in a remote area of the world, and find an isolated tribe of people that has not yet communicated with the rest of the world. You discover that this tribe uses several types of “magic dust” to treat a wide variety of human ailments, each with varying safety profiles and degrees of efficacy. For example, the tribe uses “magic dust #1” to treat headaches, nausea, fever and mild systemic pain, “magic dust #2” to treat cuts and bruises, and “magic dust #3” to treat insect bites. In fact, you observe that the tribe has isolated or developed at least 12 different kinds of “magic dust” and your observations suggest that the “magic dust” category as a whole seems to have a novel mechanism of action. You ask the tribe if you can have samples of each magic dust type to bring back home with you for analysis and they agree. When you get home, you give these samples to the medical research community, which discovers that indeed, these “magic dusts” might possibly be used effectively in the US to treat the conditions for which they are utilized by the tribe, and that their pharmacodynamic mechanism of action is, indeed, unique.

As a regulatory expert, you are charged with developing a product development plan to support an NDA submission to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for each magic dust type. You are also responsible for developing a post-market approval plan to ensure ongoing maintenance of regulatory compliance after receipt of an NDA approval. Your plan should address the following “magic dust” associated questions and/or issues:

[Order Now]

◦ What pre-clinical requirements should be summarized in the clinical development plan?

◦ How can the indications for use for each “magic dust” be isolated and refined? Why is it important to do this?◦ How can the risk vs. benefit profile associated with utilization of the “magic dust” for clinical purposes be established?◦ Should a randomized controlled trial design be utilized to conduct clinical research to support an NDA submission for the “magic dusts” or should an adaptive platform design be utilized instead?◦ Are there intellectual property issues that should be addressed?◦ How would you go about addressing pricing and reimbursement considerations?

The commercialization plan should take the form of a 10-12 page written document.

Support Pursuit of A Biopharmaceutical Product Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.