Supervised Injecting Center and the Policy Process Essay

November 29, 2022

Supervised Injecting Center and the Policy Process Essay

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Supervised Injecting Center and the Policy Process Essay

[Order Now]

The National Drug Strategic Framework in Australia provides a national policy framework to reduce the harm caused by drugs. This national strategy identifies several ‘priority areas for action, including ‘preventing use and harm’. As a response to this harm-minimization approach, several states across Australia have implemented Medically Safe Injecting Centres (MSICs).

Sydney was the first state to do so. For this assessment, you are required to write an essay using the case study of Sydney’s Medically Supervised Injecting Centre (MSIC) in Kings Cross Sydney. In this essay, you should relate this policy response to the stages of the policy process, analyzing the extent to which the introduction of the MSIC in Sydney conformed to these stages. Would you say this has been a successful policy response to the National Drug Strategy? Use relevant theory, research, and evidence to support your discussion.

Sanchez Family Case Study

I’m working on a sociology case study and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

http://www.routledgesw.com/cases THIS IS ON THE SANCHEZ FAMILY.

Papers should be 1 page single spaced. Students should use a minimum of two scholarly resources to support their responses to the case study questions. Responses to each question should be detailed and supported with scholarly works. Two scholarly works found by the student are required. Additional resources such as the course text or other course materials can be used/cited, but are in addition to the two scholarly sources found by the student. Peer reviewed articles are in APA format. Articles should be current (2015 – current). This is a social worker perspective. Interventions should be SOCIAL WORK interventions.

Questions:

Mrs. Sanchez’s own pregnancies all occurred within the context of her low income, frequent separation from her spouse, and disconnection from important supports and resources. How might this environment have affected her pregnancy and birth experiences, as well as the early development of her children? Looking at Mrs. Sanchez through a strengths perspective, how do you frame her journey to motherhood?

Considering Emilia specifically, how do you see the intersection of race and class as affecting her experience with an unplanned pregnancy?

What information in this chapter might be useful to Emilia as she considers her options for the pregnancy? How might you assess Emilia’s current need for and interest in information about her health, her pregnancy, and potential avenues?

[Order Now]

What types of interventions might you develop for Emilia? How could your work with other members of the family make a difference for Emilia at this point?

What changes to policies could affect Emilia’s experiences and potential outcomes in pregnancy?

What ethical issues might you face in working with the family, specifically during Emilia’s pregnancy? How would you propose to navigate those dilemmas?

Supervised Injecting Center and the Policy Process Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.