Studying Laws and Judicial Systems Essay

December 7, 2022

Studying Laws and Judicial Systems Essay

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Studying Laws and Judicial Systems Essay

[Order Now]

According to the findings that have been tabled, falling up is a term used about the inability to proceed due to failing or just a regular opting out whole falling down, on the other hand, is a term about a downward movement due to effects of gravity or gravitational pull from the earth epicenter (Silverstein, 2020). Falling is usually because of an external force, and it might push one to the end for the person to arrive at that decision.

I am more likely to fall up compared to the chances of falling be abuse falling is a result of an inserted force. Falling up makes of the mind, experience, and intellectual abilities. Before decides to continue to quit an activity, it requires a thoughtful analysis to come up with a thoroughly researched outcome and to stick to the choice or option of either moving in or to quit. If I find the issue or the result to likely to fail, the best option that remains is either to leave or to stop the progress since the effect will either be undesirable or not be appealing.

Going by the falling up is more attractive because one makes use of his or her conscious mind, and he or she is nit arm-twisted to arrive at a decision. I believe without external forces like gravitational pull falling cannot be attained. Some times in a court of law, culprits are beaten by law enforcers or may be denied some privileges to make him or her agree to the charges, which is not acceptable constitutionally (Silverstein, 2020).

I believe that in a court of law, a suspect is supposed to be at his right state of mind to be able to stand trials and make the correct judgment .it is also important to note that one can also analyze his evidence and check on the possible outcome of a case and decide to fall down (Mctaggart, 2011).

Some reasons behind falling down can be attributed to a reasonable lenient judgment other that time in incarceration. Lower fines and reduced paroles .one can also decide to settle the matter out of court via mutual agreement hence the likelihood of falling down. In a court of law, there is room for mutual understanding and settlement out of court and which be convenient for both parties.

[Order Now]

Again after judgment and one feels uncertified, one goes to appeal to a higher court or even goes to a supreme court. The expense expenses to be incurred when one falls down in a case can make one opt to fall up because one can be forced to meet the court case, and the defendant may feel obliged to relaunch the fact and sue the complainant of deformation.

Or if one has strong evidence and feels that its weight could determine the incident on his or her favor, he will fall up with the case or if his counsel advises in the same. Hence based on the possible repercussions falling up is more appropriate

References

McTaggart, L. (2011). The bond: How to fix your falling-down world. Simon & Schuster.

Silverstein, S. (2020). Falling up. HarperCollins.

Studying Laws and Judicial Systems Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.