Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
TOPICS for Reading Response 4 (choose ONE)
Topic 1: Discuss Paul Laurence Dunbar’s “Sympathy.”
Topic 2: Reflect on Browning’s “Soliloquy of the Spanish Cloister.” In your discussion, respond to all of the following:
OR
Compare Browning’s “Soliloquy of the Spanish Cloister” to Dorothy Parker’s “A Certain Lady.”
Topic 3: The relationship between human persons and the culture they inhabit, possess, and pass on is a central element of “The Latin Deli: An Ars Poetica.” In your discussion of Ortiz Cofer’s poem, respond to the following:
Topic 4: The poem “Death of a Young Son by Drowning” is from Atwood’s book The Journals of Susanna Moodie (1970), which is written as if spoken by Susanna Moodie, a real person (1805–85) who emigrated from England to upper Canada and wrote several books about her experiences.
In these poems, Atwood fictionalizes Moodie’s life considerably but works from actual incidents recounted by Moodie. “Death of a Young Son by Drowning” is from section II of the book, which recounts incidents in Moodie’s life between 1840 and 1871.
In your discussion, respond to all of the following:
Topic 5: Consider the concept of the fluidity of gender identity, that an individual’s gender exists on a vast spectrum. In the “The Kind of Man I Am at the DMV,” Waite intentionally obfuscates the speaker’s chosen gender while clearly interrogating the male/female dichotomy. What gender do you think the speaker identifies with?
(Note: there is no “right” answer here–multiple interpretations are possible, as long as they are supported by the text.) Examine the poem closely, and remember that the speaker is separate from the poet. Respond to all of the following:
And/or
Topic 6: Choose a poem in Chapter 12 or in the Exploring Gender album.
Prompt: Write a “mini” essay in which you show how and why the speaker experiences a conflict between particular ways of looking or being.
Your postings will be reviewed according to the following criteria:
Writing well-developed paragraphs relevant to the prompt(s) (minimum 300 words).
Be sure that your thesis is explicit and supported with one to two quotations from the literature.
Do not write in first or second person.
Following the rules of Standard English. Please proofread your writing before clicking the ‘submit’ button!
When you include a quotation from the literature in your mini-essay, please place an in-text citation (also called a parenthetical citation) immediately after you close the quotation marks and before you place a period at the end of your sentence.
That way, anyone in the class (including me!) can easily find the quotation in the literature if necessary. If you’re not sure what to place inside the parentheses, there is instruction in the textbook in Chapter 34- Quotation, Citation, and Documentation.
When you include in-text citations, there must be a Works Cited listing at the bottom of your post.
Be sure to follow the “Quote Sandwich” when you insert quotations.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwrit