Stratification Systems and Social Mobility Discussion

November 29, 2022

Stratification Systems and Social Mobility Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Stratification Systems and Social Mobility Discussion

[Order Now]

The book reading on Stratification Systems and Social Mobility identifies and examines main past and present systems of stratification ranging from slavery to caste and to class in societies, including the United States. Additionally, the supplementary reading Top Heavy: Increasing Inequality of Wealth in America and What Can Be Done about It evidences increasing class differences in the United States. Further, the two video lessons compare systems of social stratification such as caste and class.

Find and elaborate on the commonalities and differences between various systems of social stratification, including slavery, caste, estate and class, with special reference to the United States, including your own state?

SOC 604 Week 5 Vladimir Lenin and Rosa Luxemburg Extending Marxism Essay

VLADIMIR LENIN (1870-1924) & ROSA LUXEMBURG (1871-1919)

Week 5 (Oct. 5): Extending Marxism

[Order Now]

Written memos should be 2-3 single-spaced pages, 12-point font. Your memo should discuss topics or questions arising from the week’s reading. You might pull out specific passages to comment on or pull out what you see as a key concept, idea, or argument from the reading. These are thought pieces – they should be coherent, but they are not polished papers. You should end your memo by proposing at least one question for contemplation/discussion.

Coombs, Nathan. 2015. History and Event: From Marxism to Contemporary French Theory. Edinburgh University Press. Ch 3 https://learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.conten…

Blanc, Paul Le and Helene C Scott. 2010. Socialism or Barbarism: The Selected Writings of Rosa Luxemburg. Pluto Press., Ch 1 https://learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.conten…

Lenin, Vladimir I. [1917]. The State and Revolution. Ch 1 & 5 https://learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.conten…

Luxemburg, Rosa. [1918]. The Russian Revolution. Ch 1, 3, 6 &8 https://www.marxists.org/archive/luxemburg/1918/ru…

Stratification Systems and Social Mobility Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.