Stakeholder Analysis Research Essay

December 9, 2022

Stakeholder Analysis Research Essay

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Stakeholder Analysis Research Essay

[Order Now]

Overview
Have you ever listened to an argument and wondered why the people in the debate
were so passionate about their positions? Or have you ever wondered why more people
don’t try to better understand their opponents in a debate?
In Module 2 you began to explore the idea that there are many sides, or perspectives, in
a debate. In creating your literature review, you looked closely at the perspectives you
found on your chosen topic.
In Discussion 1 you looked carefully at the main issues involved with your topic. Now it
is time to synthesize all the information you have found so you can construct an
objective analysis of this topic. This is your opportunity to show your audience the
complexity and depth of your topic, to encourage them to look beyond the simple “pro-
con” positions.
In this assignment, you will conduct a stakeholder analysis on your topic. What is a
stakeholder? Anyone with a real interest in your issue, anyone with something of value
to gain or lose, is considered a stakeholder.
These are the people who have material, social, cultural, or emotional interests at stake
within your topic. These are likely to be the voices or perspectives you have been
researching in the past few discussions and assignments. You will analyze the topic and
the various stakeholders, or perspectives, from an objective viewpoint.

You should spend approximately 10 hours on this assignment.
Instructions
1. Research: You have done much of the research for this assignment already! Consult
the sources you compiled during your literature review and the information you reported
in your PowerPoint presentation. Look over your notes from your expert interview.
Decide whether you have enough information (and the best information) to create a
comprehensive analysis of this topic. Decide if you have found information to answer all
of your questions.
If not, remember that research is recursive, and continue searching for, evaluating, and
annotating sources until you feel you have a thorough understanding of the topic.
2. Pre-Write: Who are your stakeholders? Identify at least four specific stakeholders or
stakeholder groups. What are their values? Why do they think this issue is important?
What do they have to gain or lose? What is their goal regarding your topic? How are
their positions similar or different from one another? Look at this topic from their various
perspectives and examine what these voices have to say.
3. Write: Write an essay where you carefully and thoughtfully analyze this topic through
the viewpoints of the stakeholders involved.
· Introduction: In your introduction you should give a thorough overview of the topic.
Give background information, history, and context to the issue. Identify the main points
of conflict or debate. Finally, identify the stakeholders you will discuss in the body
paragraphs.
· Body: Explain the stakeholders and their positions. Devote at least one paragraph to
each stakeholder’s position. Explain who they are, what they have at stake, and why the
topic is significant to them.
· Body: Analyze the stakeholders. How are the stakeholders’ positions similar and
different? What are the connections between the stakeholders? Why are they similar
and different? What makes this topic so complex?
· Conclusion: Add your voice to the conversation. Synthesize the information you
present in your body paragraphs. In your assessment, what is the future of this topic?

[Order Now]
4. You should use 5-7 sources for this essay. Your essay should contain 4-5 quotations
from your sources, and should paraphrase other main ideas. Be sure to use quotation
marks and in-text citations appropriately and responsibly.
5. Your essay should be approximately 1,000-1,100 words.
6. Please be sure to correctly format your essay in MLA Style and create an MLA Works
Cited page. Need help with MLA? Please refer to the CCCOnline MLA Citation Toolkit

Stakeholder Analysis Research Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.