Stages of the Research Process Evaluation

January 17, 2023

Stages of the Research Process Evaluation

Order Number	65464576645863
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Stages of the Research Process Evaluation

The importance of peer-reviewed studies is vital in business research. You will have the opportunity to find examples of peer-reviewed sources to both apply to your research in this course, but also to help understand the importance of using scholarly sources in general. You will also use this assignment to dig into the various stages of research including purpose, the research hypothesis, variables, and design methods. Assignment Steps Locate at least two peer-reviewed, business-research studies based on the industry in which you work or would like to work. Write a 1,050-word evaluation of the critical first stage of the research studies: State the purpose of the business research for each study. Determine the research questions and hypotheses being researched in each study. Identify the dependent and independent variables being manipulated or measured in each study. Determine if the variables are measured qualitatively or quantitatively. Discuss the ways in which you might apply research to your current work or desired career. Format your assignment consistent with APA guidelines. Submit your assignment.

i am studying business analytics an plan to own a child care in the future , so you could take inspiration from that .

[Order Now]

Stages of the Research Process Evaluation

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.