Order Number |
cvfde45678 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Course code: bas211 sports sociology course name: sports sociology Task brief & rubrics
Task: Final Assignment (60%)
1) Theoretical Part – Answer the following questions
2) Case Study: “Bad Sport1”
Choose one of the cases depicted in the Netflix Series “Bad Sport” to: (i) define and explain the relationship between deviance and sport; (ii)
briefly explain (in bullet points) how sports organizations can address the issue of sports manipulation.
Formalities:
Submission: Week 13 – Sunday 16/01/2022 23:59 CEST
Weight: This task is a 60% of your total grade for this subject.
1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwQcnDT7xT0t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwQcnDT7xT0t
It assesses the following learning outcomes:
sports.
Rubrics:
Exceptional 90-100 Good 80-89 Fair 70-79 Marginal fail 60-69
Knowledge & Understanding
(30%)
Student demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner.[Order Now]
Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary.
Student understands the task and provides minimum theory and/or some use of vocabulary.
Student understands the task and attempts to answer the question but does not mention key concepts or uses minimum amount of relevant vocabulary.
Application (20%) Student applies fully relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class.
Student applies mostly relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class.
Student applies some relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstanding may be evident.
Student applies little relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstands are evident.
Critical Thinking (30%)
Student critically assesses in excellent ways, drawing outstanding conclusions from relevant authors.
Student critically assesses in good ways, drawing conclusions from relevant authors and references.
Student provides some insights but stays on the surface of the topic. References may not be relevant.
Student makes little or none critical thinking insights, does not quote appropriate authors, and does not provide valid sources.
Communication (20%)
Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck
Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck
Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly over or under the wordcount limit. Some misspelling errors may be evident.
Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. Does not reach or does exceed wordcount excessively and misspelling errors are evident