Sociology Symbolic Interactionism Theory Discussion

November 29, 2022

Sociology Symbolic Interactionism Theory Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Sociology Symbolic Interactionism Theory Discussion

[Order Now]

I’m working on a sociology discussion question and need a sample draft to help me learn.

Select one of the four theories, conflict, feminist, structural functionalist or symbolic interactionism theory to explain the following questions.

Due to misconduct in police departments throughout North America, the image of “Officer Friendly” has changed dramatically over the years. What do you think happens to the value of the Law Enforcement Oath of Honor when the very ones that we trust to serve and protect us, becomes the very ones that we fear the most?

Furthermore, how do you think Americans and other countries look at police departments in North America after countless numbers of incidents of police brutality and killings of unarmed black and brown people, much like George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Laquan McDonald, Philando Castile, Freddie Gray, Michael Brown and Eric Garner just to name a few.

Social Cognitive Theory of Gender Reflection

I’m working on a sociology question and need guidance to help me learn.

[Order Now]

Chapter 5:

Based on the textbook, what is the main idea behind the social cognitive theory of gender? Also, explain in detailhow this theory can explain personal experiences related to gender development. You can support your answer by providing examples in your own personal life or someone you know.
Using the textbook as a reference, discuss the four main socioemotional differences between males and females. Provide an example based on your personal life or someone you know for each difference.
Based on the textbook, what is the main belief behind the social role theory of gender? Also, explain how this theory can explain personal experiences, related to gender development. You can support your answer by providing examples in your own personal life or someone you know.

This video may help: “Alice Dreger: Is anatomy destiny?” —

Sociology Symbolic Interactionism Theory Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.