Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
In “How do Heterosexual Undergraduate Students Define Having Sex?,” which of the following was NOT one of Sewell and Strassberg’s findings?
A.the context within which physical intimacy occurs significantly affects judgements whether they count as “sex” among the undergraduate students in the study
B.There is a direct link among the undergraduate students in the study to uncertainty about what counts as “sex” and engaging in risky behaviors.
C.There is substantial uncertainty when it comes to defining what counts as “sex” among the undergraduate students in the study
D.there is a strong social norm among the undergraduate students in the study that penile-vaginal intercourse counts as having “sex”
Which of the following is NOT argued by Georgiann Davis in “Bringing Intersexy Back”?
A.Intersexuality has primarily been viewed as an abnormality within the medical community that needs to be surgically corrected.
B.Recently, the medical community has argued for a shift away from intersex and sex reversal terminology in favor of new “disorders of sexual development” language.
C.Most respondents went through genital surgery as children, which left them emotionally and physically scarred.
D.The medical profession has historically embraced intersexuality as a challenge to the sex binary and as evidence of the naturally occurring sexual variability that exists
According to Brandon Ambrosino’s essay “I Am Gay—But I Wasn’t Born This Way,” growing public support for gays and lesbians is most related to…
A.the increase in gay and lesbian characters on television.
B.one’s own same-gender sexual experience(s).
C.knowing someone who is gay.
D.believing that people are born homosexual or heterosexual.
In Toni Silva’s article “Bud-Sex,” many of the married participants…
A.wanted open relationships so they could be honest with their wives.
B.wanted their wives to participate in group sex with other men
C.described their marriages as unhappy.
D,did not consider having sex with other men as cheating on their wives.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/