Sociology Department of Homeland Security Goals

November 29, 2022

Sociology Department of Homeland Security Goals

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Sociology Department of Homeland Security Goals

[Order Now]

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review the DHS Strategic Plan: FY2020-2024. Then read Chapter 13 of your primary text. The Final Research Paper builds on itself throughout the course. Each week is broken down below.

Week 1:

Select one of the Department of Homeland Security goals of your choice. This must be a stand-alone statement following your introduction and thesis (e.g., DHS Goal: Secure U.S. Borders and Approaches, or Secure Cyberspace and Critical Infrastructure, etc.).

Explain a current issue for your research. (Note the approved list of topics. You may select one of these, or select one of your own. Note your instructor must approve your issue to be addressed in your Final Research Paper.)

Explain the issues, threats, or hazards that are affecting the resolution of the vulnerabilities. Identify any constitutional issues in play.

Week 2:

Begin your research for your Final Research Paper. It is recommended that you start your research by identifying a Research Starter for your topic in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.

Note the “Research Starter” should address the common issues for the topic. Note the bibliography is a good place to identify additional resources for your paper. This should set you up for success with writing your Final Research Paper.

Week 3:

Finalize your six credible references. Note two of these must be scholarly and found in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.

Sketch out the outline for your Final Research Paper.

Week 4:

Complete your research, and complete your first rough draft of your Final Research Paper.

Week 5:

Complete the writing of your Final Research Paper. Conduct your final reviews.

[Order Now]

Identify the DHS goal and issue that you will address in the Final Research Paper.

Summarize the various points of view that frame the homeland security issue, threat, or hazard that leads to a vulnerability.

Describe the various roles and responsibilities of the various levels of government with respect to the issue under review.

Explain your personal position on how the Department of Homeland Security should address vulnerability using mitigation, prevention, and preparedness techniques.

Sociology Department of Homeland Security Goals

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.