Sociological Perspective of a Family Summary

November 29, 2022

Sociological Perspective of a Family Summary

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Sociological Perspective of a Family Summary

[Order Now]

I’m working on a sociology question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

For this assignment, go to this Humans of New York website (Links to an external site.) (Link will open in new tab.)and explore a series for stories based on either sexuality, family, or religion. In a 1-2 page paper, summarize the Series article you chose and explain how the Series feature relates to a sociological issue in sexuality, family, or religion that you read in your text or lessons from this week. Be sure to relate the series article directly back to class material.

Grumpy Old Men Short Presentation

identify a movie, newspaper article, novel, children’s book or other form of media that provides a representation of an older adult. You will deconstruct the representation and discuss any ageist stereotypes, or lack thereof, about aging. You should clearly define what these stereotypes are and how they might shape negative attitudes about aging for the target audience. If the media representation does not have ageist stereotypes, you must provide clear evidence for the absence of ageism and describe how the representation might shape positive attitudes about aging for the target audience.

[Order Now]

Dear freelancer,

The writing assignment should have the following subheadings in the body of the paper, and they should be centered and bolded: Summary, Response, Opinion. Keep the sections with sub-headings distinct from one another.

Summary: Provide a summary on chapter-4 “Families and Social Class” in The Family: Diversity, Inequality, and Social Change discussion on Educational Inequality. There should be 1-in-text citation and 1-direct quote in the summary section of the paper.
Response: Provide a response to the summary: This means you have to provide outside material and summarize it, but the outside material has to discuss Educational Inequality. The outside material should be a book, scholarly article, or newspaper article. However, if you provide a newspaper article please make sure the article is a reputable source (e.g. Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, or The New York Times). There should be 1-in-text citation and 1-direct quote in the response section of the paper.
Opinion: In this section of the paper you are allowed to voice your opinion with regards to the chapter’s discussion and the outside material on Educational Inequality. You can write in first person in this section of the paper, in my opinion, or I believe.

Sociological Perspective of a Family Summary

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.