Social Work Perceptions of Family Empowerment Reflection

November 28, 2022

Social Work Perceptions of Family Empowerment Reflection

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Social Work Perceptions of Family Empowerment Reflection

[Order Now]

Read the Perceptions of Family Empowerment Article: Module 03 Paper Whitely Perceptions of Empowerment Full Version (3).pdf Based on the additional readings in Module 3, YouTube video and review of the AARP website, please read the following case example and submit a reflection answering the following questions. Be sure to incorporate the readings, video and websites into your reflection: Case Example for Reflection #2What are the risks of grandparents raising grandchildren?What factors place them as a population-at-risk? How did each of the programs explored (AARP, and the Grandparents Who Care) seek to achieve each of the following means of group empowerment:

[Order Now]

Effects of Federal Budget on Social Problems in The US Discussion

eview the federal budget resources. What are the consequences of the current federal budget on social problems in the U.S.? Given the high rates of poverty and other social problems in the U.S., should we spend more money on discretionary social programs? If so, how do we pay for these programs – should we cut funding of some programs (like defense) or increase taxes (possibly on high income people or corporations)? Note that people who are moved out of poverty or have their social problems resolved often pay more taxes, and help our overall economy and society. Cite your sources.

Social Work Perceptions of Family Empowerment Reflection

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.