Order Number |
65363737383 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY/DISERTATION |
Writer Level |
PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED |
Format |
APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD |
Academic Sources |
10 -20 |
Page Count |
4-8 PAGES |
Social Work and Mental Health Practice
Remember, this is an outline that is in the developing stages. Some may change, but this is required to help you begin the process. Please do not wait to get working on your assignment. There can be many moving parts.
You will choose your topic of interest that relates to social work and mental health practice. Feel free to use the book and course resources, and ask your instructor to clarify topics.
Title (Think up a descriptive title. Try to be creative if it fits).
Speaker (Your name here).
Purpose (What is the purpose or intention behind your presentation? What do you want the audience to take away from your talk? Why is it important for your audience to hear this talk? Why are you passionate about this topic)?
Hook Opening (Something interesting/funny/special that makes us want to listen to the rest of your talk).
ETHOS (Why are you an expert on this topic? How will it help us to know these things)? PATHOS (What emotions should you evoke in us to make us care)?
LOGOS (What data can you show us? Examples? Testimonial? What reasoning, evidence, facts exist about this subject)?
Motivation (Talk about your purpose or what the audience should learn from your project. Inspire your audience with your passion and excitement about this topic).
Conclusion (Include a meaningful “take-away”/reflection for the audience).
Visual (Include slides for elaboration to help you remember. Visuals can also help drive points home that is essential to your message).
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/