Social Dilemma Documentary Analysis Essay

November 30, 2022

Social Dilemma Documentary Analysis Essay

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Social Dilemma Documentary Analysis Essay

[Order Now]

Description: view the documentary Social Dilemma and apply the content to A) their own consumption and B) class concepts. Students are expected to answer each point of content below in a manner that indicates they did, in fact, view the documentary (part 1), conduct the reflection exercise (part 2) and apply the text material (part 3).

Submission & Grading: Students should type their answers to the content outlined below in the WORD document provided on Blackboard. To submit the WORD file, follow the BB link via “Content ->Submit Assignments.” This assignment is worth 1/5 of your ADT grade and will be scored out of a maximum 100 points.

CONTENT:

PART 1: Notes from the documentary

View the documentary Social Dilemma to answer the questions in this part. It is currently available on Netflix (which offers a free trial).

Describe, in detail, the issue(s) being presented in this documentary.

The focal point. What are we meant to see as the big issue causing a lot of problems?

Consequences. Who and what is impacted? Briefly explain how and why.

Antecedents. Where does the issue originate? (What/who is causing or perpetuating the issue?)

What are the pros and cons of social media, as presented in the documentary (describe at least 3)?

PART 2: Reflection & Critical Thought

What was the most shocking thing you learned in this documentary? (2-3 sentences, be specific)

What is one thing you might change about your own behavior, based on what you learned from this documentary? Give a specific example of what you learned that might change your own behavior. (3-4sentences)

PART 3: Application of Class Concepts

The Marketing Mix. Take your best shot at describing the 4Ps (product, price, placement, and promotion) for social media. (4 sentences)

Market Environment. Describe the competitive environment for social media. Then choose one social media platform to conduct a SWOT. (6-7 sentences, may require that you investigate the company a bit).

[Order Now]

Digital Engagement. Explain how social media turns the “Wheel of Social Media Engagement.” Address each component of the wheel (Figure 3.3), using terms and concepts from your text. Be specific and elaborate on the connection between your points and what you learned in the documentary (2 paragraphs).

Ethics. To what extent are social media companies (for profit organizations) responsible for protecting consumers from the negative impacts of their products and experiences? Think critically, using what you learned from text chapter 4 and relating it to what you learned in the documentary (6-7 sentences, using terms and ideas from your text).

Social Dilemma Documentary Analysis Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.