SOCI 3305 Sociology Discussion Assignment

November 28, 2022

SOCI 3305 Sociology Discussion Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

SOCI 3305 Sociology Discussion Assignment

[Order Now]

SOCI 3305

DP# 5: Think about the cost of research. Why is this important? Give an example of a research project where costs would be minimal? Give an example when a research project would be expensive? Specifically, what would cost money? How are some ways a researcher can get money to fund his or her research? Word Count 250-300 words
HW: Go to the following website managed by the U.S. Census Bureau:

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/TX,US/EDU685218

This site provides data on an array of information collected by the Census Bureau and displays it by nation, state, and county. You will select the state of Texas and analyze how it compares with comparable national data on educational level, poverty indicators, racial and ethnic composition, population growth, and age of the population. Next, you will select a county within the state of Texas and compare it to the Texas state-level data on the same measures mentioned above.

[Order Now]

You will put the data, on the measures above, in a word document and submit it.

SOCI 3312

DP#5: Look at the following:

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/why-the-death-penalty-is-on-the-decline/

What are the three reasons cited by Ms. Childress that states are moving away from the death penalty? Which one do you think is the most valid reason to move away from the death penalty? Do the reasons cause you to question your stance on the DP? Word Count 250-300 words

SOCI 3305 Sociology Discussion Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.