SOC 133 Four Cases From Russian Revolution

November 29, 2022

SOC 133 Four Cases From Russian Revolution

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

SOC 133 Four Cases From Russian Revolution

[Order Now]

Prompt: Develop an essay that compares any two of the four cases from this module (American Civil War, Russian Revolution) Develop the comparison with close reference to the introductory reading from Week 8 (‘Social Movements and Revolutions’). Thus you’ll be citing a total of three readings (chapters). Your comparison can focus on signal ‘events’ (e.g., the 1979 Iranian Revolution or the 1949 Chinese Revolution), on the broader revolutionary history of the countries in question, or on both.

Structure: Write an outline before you execute your essay. Begin your essay with a 2/3 page introductory paragraph in which you broadly describe the events you’re going to focus on from the two case studies. Close the introductory paragraph with a 1-2 sentence thesis statement in bold. The thesis statement should contain your core argument, centering on a basic comparative claim regarding the two cases. A possible approach is to identify one central similarity and one central difference between the two.

Following the thesis statement, develop 5 to 6 body paragraphs (each about 2/3-3/4 page). Each paragraph should begin with a strong topic sentence containing its core argumentative claim. The topic sentence should be linked to the thesis. Build out a logical sequence of argument as you move from paragraph to paragraph, topic sentence to topic sentence, and utilize transitional language in the topic sentences to generate analyticalflow. End the paper with a brief (3-4 sentence) concluding paragraph that considers the broader implications of the foregoing argument.

[Order Now]

Grading criteria: You’ll be graded on the cogency of your comparative argument (how cohesive, convincing, and interesting it is) and on the depth of engagement with course concepts (especially readings).

SOC 133 Four Cases From Russian Revolution

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.