Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
The National Organization of Human Services (NOHS) Code of Ethics provides an overview of the ethical standards we need to adhere to in this field. Each are important to ensure that human services workers in variety of settings serve our clients using the same fundamental values. We’ll dig into the various sections of the Code of Ethics throughout the course.
Instructions:
In a minimum of two pages (not counting the title page and reference page), address the following:
Identify the three standards from the NOHS Code of Ethics that you view as the most important.
Explain the significance of these standards and consider why they are in place.
Share any personal experiences that have reinforced the importance of these standards.
Discuss challenges that could be experienced related to upholding these standards.
Use professional language including complete sentences and proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation throughout your paper. Be sure to cite the Code of Ethics in APA format.
Requirements:
Minimum of two pages (not counting the title page and reference page)
Title page in APA format
In-text citations for the NOHS Code of Ethics completed in APA format
APA formatted Reference page
Clearly identifies three standards from the NOHS code of ethics and describes their significance
Explains personal experiences that have reinforced the importance of these standards
Describes potential challenges in upholding the identified standards
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/