Shipping Analysis Memo Essay Paper

November 30, 2022

Shipping Analysis Memo Essay Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Shipping Analysis Memo Essay Paper

[Order Now]

M5 – GM Micro-Challenge: Transport

Your manager’s memo to you is below. In it your manager is giving you tasks to address regarding international trade. You are not expected to be an expert, just willing and able to use the resources available to develop an accurate response.

Your memo should start with an introduction that reminds the manager what s/he requested you to do. Next, overview the information your manager can expect to find in your memo. After that, respond to each topic you were requested to address in sequence. For each topic, your response should clearly state the question(s) you understood you were to address. Then give a written response to the question that summarizes the source information. Your written response should then be supported with (1) an image that shows the specific source information you used, and (2) a weblink to that source in case your manager wants to seek out additional information. Note: An image does not replace your written response, it only shows the source information used. Finally, you may choose to provide a conclusion to your memo.

You should provide info about the sources as is illustrated in the example below. Screen clip an image of each source and include it. That image should show the name of YOUR COUNTRY. Also include the weblink for that source. (YOUR CCOUNTRY should be Malta and YOUR STATE is Minnesota)

To: You

From: Your Manager

Date: Nov. 8, 2021

Subject: Transport

Some clients that participated in the trade mission for which you provided the research were pleased to encounter some potential buyers. They wanted to get some details associated with shipping their goods. They have contacted your organization for help.

Consider each subject, examine sources, and provide a brief response. Screen clip and include an image of your source material. That image should show the name of YOUR COUNTRY/YOUR STATE and the exact information that supports your response. If you cannot find the exact information, use a port very close by to get a rough idea.

[Order Now]

Some potential sources you might find helpful are provided.

If the company exports a 40′ standard Full Load Container (FCL) of goods, about how long will it take by sea to get from the US maritime port nearest YOUR STATE to the foreign maritime port nearest to the capital of the first country you recommended?
Identify the two relevant maritime ports. The World Port Source website HERE (Links to an external site.)may help. As the sale has not been finalized, use a broad time frame for shipping – something within the next six weeks. (Use the Ship Schedules tool available at SeaRates HERE (Links to an external site.).) Use an average transit time in days.
What are two shipping lines that could be used? For these two shipping lines, what support services do they offer in addition to shipping?
The Ship Schedules tool will provide you with the abbreviation for shipping lines companies. Visit their websites and determine what additional services are available from them.
A rough cost for ocean freight would be helpful. What is an estimate of the current shipping rate in US dollars.
Using the two relevant maritime ports and the containerized shipping option, try to get the current market rate between these two ports. (Use the Freight Calculator tool available at World Freight Rates HERE (Links to an external site.).) Use an average transit time in days. Note: If this does not work, skip this step – other websites want a user to register to get info.
What is a secure, bonded warehouse at or near that foreign maritime port that could be used until the importer picks up the container? What is their contact information?
Visit the website for that foreign maritime port or that port city and determine what secure, bonded warehousing options are available.
Repeat steps 1. to 4. for a second product from YOUR STATE to the foreign maritime port nearest to the capital of the second country you recommended.
View the ship traffic around these two foreign maritime ports. Which one is busier?
Visit Shiptraffic.net, the maritime website monitoring ship traffic HERE (Links to an external site.). Compare the bodies of water (i.e., strait, canal, gulf, bay, sea, etc.) that are nearest each of these two foreign maritime ports you proposed above. Each of those colored shapes is a specific ship. Which port has denser ship traffic around it? Explain why you think there is a difference. Does that difference impact your interest in exporting to either of these two countries?

Shipping Analysis Memo Essay Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.