Self introduction outline

February 13, 2023

Self introduction outline

Order Number	867765435464536
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Self introduction outline

Introduction:

Attention-getter.

Orienting material (including stating your name clearly)

List thesis (listing the three main ideas)

Body Point 1: __________________

Main Idea:

Major Supporting Detail 1

Minor Supporting Details

Major Supporting Detail 2

Minor Supporting Details

Major Supporting Detail 3 (optional)

Minor Supporting Details

Body Point 2: __________________

Main Idea:

Major Supporting Detail 1

Minor Supporting Details

Major Supporting Detail 2

Minor Supporting Details

Major Supporting Detail 3 (optional)

Minor Supporting Details

Body Point 3: __________________

Main Idea:

Major Supporting Detail 1

Minor Supporting Details

Major Supporting Detail 2

Minor Supporting Details

Major Supporting Detail 3 (optional)

Minor Supporting Details

Conclusion:

Reinforce your thesis/main points
Reach out to audience
End with a related, compelling quotation or call to action

Instructions

Draft your Speech 1 Self-Introduction Outline:

Read about Speech 1 Self-Introduction – content, planning, and other requirements – as outlined in the Module 2 Unit A Readings & Videos.
Copy and paste the “Template for Self-Introductory Outline” and use it to plan your speech.
Submit your completed outline for your Speech 1 Self-Introduction Outline

Resources Used:

List references/research sources here in alphabetical order by author’s last name. Include dates of publication and other information per MLA requirements.

NOTES ABOUT PLANNING YOUR FIRST SPEECH:

Your intro paragraph should not just start with your name. It should create interest by starting with a legitimate attention-getting device as described in our videos.

The body is divided into and oriented around three main points/areas. Your speech must do this also. Think of three things that represent you, three dreams you have, three things that define you, three things people always say about you, three things you don’t want to do or are NOT known for. See how each of these could be made to go together? Make sure these things are different from each other and also original, BUT make sure they can be interrelated and woven together thematically to form a cohesive, meaningful thesis and message as well. (Lori’s sample speech does a great job at this!)

Note also that each body point should be equally developed. That means, if you use three minor points of support to drive body paragraph/point one, you should do about the same for body points two and three. This will give your speech balance and greater effectiveness.

Finally, notice that the conclusion should end on a strong, striking note. This is sometimes called a “punch.” Remember to end your speech with such a “punch,” giving your listeners something to consider and think about even after your speech is over.

[Order Now]

Self introduction outline

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.