Self Analysis Essay

January 24, 2023

Self Analysis Essay

Order Number	6562534783636726
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Self Analysis Essay

Self-Analysis Essay. In this assignment, you will use a reflective learning theory as a framework for analyzing a problem. The problem you select must be different than any you’ve chosen in a previous ORGL course. Your essay will be composed of two parts:

Part 1 Decide what problem you faced using your own experience. Give background information. Use your own experience (from work, school, volunteer or personal environments). The situation may have occurred recently or in the distant past. Factually and succinctly describe the problem using your current knowledge and experience.

Part 2 Apply one of the theories of reflective learning from our course to the problem and discuss the following:

When did you have to learn a new theoretical framework or change the usual way that you thought about your work?

When “schools of thought” you worked with have changed, how did you adjust?

When you look back on your learning experiences, how have the theories that were popular at the time affected how decisions and

choices were made by you and those you worked with?

Are there any theoretical approaches being used that you wish you had been exposed to or learned more about earlier in your career?

Note your personal development.

Assignment Expectations Your essay shall be between 3 to 5 pages (excluding cover page and reference page) and shall have the following sections: Title page (not included in page count) Introduction Narrative Conclusion Reference page (not included in page count)

Formatting should include: 1″ margins, double spaced, 12 point font

Citation Expectations Cite the reflective learning theory used Use in-text citations for quotes or material not your own Use your choice of citation style URLs alone are not acceptable

[Order Now]

Self Analysis Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.