Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Self Actualization Autonomy and Relationships
According to Maslow, human beings are hardwired to self actualize, yet he estimated that fewer than 1 percent of the population ever reaches self actualization. Self-actualization is at the top of Maslow’s pyramid of needs, and refers to someone who has met all underlying needs and is operating at a point where they have found their purpose in life. It is more than merely reaching extrinsic goals one sets for himself/herself, but often refers to operating at one’s highest level and discovering what one’s purpose in life is and fulfilling it. This often includes a spiritual component.
Discussions are an opportunity for you to communicate your ideas clearly and effectively, interact and challenge your peers respectfully, and support your writing with examples and scholarly resources. Be sure to answer all questions and view the rubric to be sure you can earn maximum points.
This activity addresses Module Outcomes 2, 3, & 4. Upon successful completion of this activity, you will be able to:
MO2: Describe how concepts from Maslow’s theory can be combined with self determination theory to promote self actualization. (CO4)
MO3: Apply motivational theory to personal life and career goals. (CO4)
MO4: Identify an intervention for supporting need satisfaction. (CO3)
This activity aligns with the career competencies of written communication and critical thinking.
For your discussion posting this week, address the following:
Discuss the following:
1. In your own opinion, what does self actualization mean to you? In other words, if you were operating at a completely self actualized level, what would it look like?
2. Thinking about Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and self actualization, in addition to self determination theory’s identified psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, and their role in both motivation and psychological well being, discuss how the two theories interact with one another.
3. How might you use concepts from these two theories to promote happiness, well-being, and self actualization in your own life?
Keep the following points in mind when working in the discussion forums:
Postings should display originality in thought and insightful synthesis.
Postings should demonstrate understanding of key concepts.
Responses should be original and stimulate discussion.
Remember to properly cite and reference your sources in APA format.
Self Actualization Autonomy and Relationships[
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow