SDSU Sexual Orientation Discussion Essay

November 28, 2022

SDSU Sexual Orientation Discussion Essay

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

SDSU Sexual Orientation Discussion Essay

[Order Now]

After reviewing the materials for this week answer ONEof the following prompts of your choice in a couple paragraphs. Be sure to start your response with the bold title of the topic you picked. Cite at least two of the materials from this Canvas module, but also feel free to cite other scholarly materials as well:

Sexual Orientation/Identity: Are we born straight, gay, bi, or otherwise; or do we socialize into our sexual orientation? Can we intentionally shift our preferences? If so, how? If not, why?

Sexual Attraction: Are the objects and subjects of our attraction mostly biologically fixed (“you can’t help liking what you like”), or mostly open to re-socialization (“you can learn to like a lot of things”)? Why?

Monogamy: Is monogamy more likely the result of natural selection because it gave the human species particular survival advantages, or is it more likely a social custom serving evolving social needs from society to society? How so?

Feel free to comment on the posts of your classmates and to “like” the ones you find particularly compelling. The thread will sort by likes.

[Order Now]

Review the following materials:

Examples from Anthropology: Cultural differences in sexuality – Wikiversity

Brief Video: Sexuality Across Cultures (2:47)

Charts: 6 maps and charts that explain sex around the world

Podcast- Invisibilia: Where Do Our Sexual Preferences Come From, And How Flexible Are They? (1:00:53)

SDSU Sexual Orientation Discussion Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.