SCC1055 Five Main Sociological Research Methods Paper

November 28, 2022

SCC1055 Five Main Sociological Research Methods Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

SCC1055 Five Main Sociological Research Methods Paper

[Order Now]

Research Methods:

Choose a sociological situation that you would like to research. Some examples would be: How guests of different genders react at a wedding, how various employees respond to good/bad news from their employer, the length of time individuals of different ages spend on social media and / or the reasons why they use social media, students’ response to changes at their schools caused by a pandemic, the ways people of various ethnicities celebrate national holidays, etc.

Compare and contrast how each of the five Main Sociological Research Methods would support your research (you do not have to conduct the research itself). Include the benefits and limitations of each method as it relates to your specific subject. Note any particular advantages or disadvantages of one method over others (for example, if would be impossible to use the interview method with individuals who died on the Titanic).

UW Whitewater Diversity and Inclusion on Campus Research Article Essay

Find a scholarly article about Diversity and Inclusion on campus and write a summary of the article that will include the following information in a Word document.

Research Article Presentation Instructions
? Author(s). Year. “Tile of article.” Journal Name Volume:page numbers.
? Abstract/Summary of article
o Research question(s) being investigated
o The data and methods used to investigate the question(s).
? Literature the authors engage
o This can be brief and does not need to be detailed. You will want
to say something along the lines of: other people have
investigated x, y, and z. The authors argue that we still do not
know (the question(s) they are asking and trying to answer).
? Data and Research Methods
o Briefly describe what data are being analyzed and how it is being
analyzed.
? Main findings in relation to the research question(s)
o What did the authors find?
? Conclusion
o Provide a few summary sentences about what the authors
conclude
o Do they mention how their findings add to what we know and in
what way?
o Do they suggest either policy implications or offer suggestions for
future research?

Literature Review Article Instructions
Please note: if you are a student presenting an article that is a review of literature and
not a research article, your presentation and written summary will look a little
different. Still include:
? Author(s). Year. “Tile of article.” Journal Name Volume:page numbers.
? Abstract/Summary of article
o Research being reviewed, e.g., topic(s)
? How do the author(s) organize the literature being reviewed?

[Order Now]

oFor example, does the article review studies on diversity and/or

inclusion, and if so, how are the studies discussed? For example,
are there subheadings, such as Diversity on Campuses or
Diversity in the Workplace, etc.
o Provide a summary of the different types of research discussed
in the article.
o Are there any conclusions about what we currently know?
o Are there any suggestions for future research?

SCC1055 Five Main Sociological Research Methods Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.