RSCH 600 Graduate Research Methods Prospectus Assignment

RSCH 600 Graduate Research Methods Prospectus Assignment

Instructions/Descriptions

RSCH 600 Graduate Research Methods Prospectus Assignment

[Order Now]

Important: Do not alter the template formatting
Student Name, ID # & Section #:
Research Title
Instructions Copy-paste from the Literature Abstracting Assignment. Feel

free to make improvements as required. [0 points]

Research Topic

Instructions Copy-paste from the Literature Abstracting Assignment. Feel

free to make improvements as required. [0 points]

Part 1: Problems &
Gaps
Section 1.1: Problem

Instructions

Please follow the guidelines provided in the Chapter 5 of our
textbook as well as the instructions given in lectures. Be sure to
include justification of the significance of the problem with
respect to your targeted audiences (please specify). This
section should be seven lines, maximum, and cited using the
abstracted literature. [40 points]

Section 1.2: Gaps in
Literature

Instructions

Based on the abstracted literature, find a gap that previous
studies did not adequately address, and that you believe is
worth filling. Similar studies to your intended one, might have
been conducted, but not in the same exact context of yours.
This section should not exceed 10 lines and be cited using the
abstracted literature. [40 points]

Writing Mechanics
Instructions

Please proofread your assignments before submission. Points
will be deducted for spelling, grammatical and formatting errors
as well as APA violations and poor originality. Plagiarized
papers will be rejected and reported to Academics. [20 points]

Part 2: Purpose &
RQ’s
Section 2.1: Purpose
Instructions

Use the guidelines provided in Chapter 6 of our textbook and
the corresponding lecture to write a purpose statement for your
intended study. This section should be written concisely and not
exceed five lines. [40 points]

Section 2.2: Research
Question
Instructions

Use the guidelines provided in Chapter 7 of our textbook and
the corresponding lecture to articulate your central research
question. This section should be no longer than 3 lines and
requires no citation. [40 points]

Writing Mechanics
Instructions

Please proofread your assignments before submission. Points
will be deducted for spelling, grammatical and formatting errors
as well as APA violations and poor originality. Plagiarized
papers will be rejected and reported to Academics. [20 points]

For Parts 3 & 4,
choose either the
QUAL or the QUANT
option, and delete the
other.

Part 3/QUAL: Design,
Role & Data Collection
Section 3.1: Design
Instructions Name the qualitative design you wish to adopt and explain the
rationale of your choice. This section should not exceed five
lines. [25 points]

Section 3.2:
Researcher’s Role
Instructions Briefly describe your role as a researcher, in no more than five

lines. [25 points]

Section 3.3: Data
Collection
Instructions

Profile your participants and chose two data collection types,
including an option for each type (see Table 9.2 in Creswell &
Creswell). Write a short justification for each of the two options.
This section should not exceed ten lines. Use bullet formatting,
or tables for profile and data collection type/option. [30 points]

Writing Mechanics
Instructions

Please proofread your assignments before submission. Points
will be deducted for spelling, grammatical and formatting errors
as well as APA violations and poor originality. Plagiarized
papers will be rejected and reported to Academics. [20 points]

Part 4/QUAL: Data
Recording, Analysis &
Validity
Section 4.1: Data
Recording
Instructions Of the two data collection types, which you specified above,
pick the primary type, and draft a brief protocol for it. This
section should not exceed five lines. [25 points]

Section 4.2: Analysis
Instructions Briefly describe your data analysis plan in maximum four

lines. [25 points]

Section 4.3: Validity
Instructions Pick two strategies to assure validity of your findings and
provide a two-line description for each. Your descriptions
should be tailored to your specific research project. [30 points]

Writing Mechanics
Instructions Please proofread your assignments before submission. Points
will be deducted for spelling, grammatical and formatting errors
as well as APA violations and poor originality. Plagiarized
papers will be rejected and reported to Academics. [20 points]

Part 3/QUANT:
Sampling, Hypothesis
& Variables’
Relationship
Section 3.1: Sampling
Instructions

Describe your target population and profile your research’s unit
of analysis. Use a bulleted format for profiling. State the
sampling method you will adopt. This section should be limited
to ten lines. [25 points]

Section 3.2:
Hypothesis &
Variables
Instructions

State an alternative (researcher’s) hypothesis, and name one
dependent and one independent variable. Describe each
variable, by stating its unit and method of measurement. This
section should not exceed six lines and be drawn from your
RQ. [25 points]

Section 3.3: Variables’
Relationship
Instructions

Describe the rationale behind constructing your hypothesis. In
other words, what logical argument (to be cited) or theoretical
basis (to be cited) makes you believe that the relationship
exists and that testing it makes good sense. [30 points]

Writing Mechanics
Instructions

Please proofread your assignments before submission. Points
will be deducted for spelling, grammatical and formatting errors
as well as APA violations and poor originality. Plagiarized
papers will be rejected and reported to Academics. [20 points]

Part 4/QUANT:
Instrumentation,
Analysis &
Interpretation
Section 4.1:
Instrumentation
Instructions Describe the survey instrument which you are going to use for
data collection. Include 1-2 survey question examples. This
section should not exceed seven lines. [25 points]

Section 4.2: Analysis
Instructions Briefly describe your data analysis tool in maximum four

lines. [25 points]

Section 4.3:
Interpretation
Instructions Describe how you will interpret the result in one paragraph of
four lines, maximum. Refer to effect and confidence in your
description. [30 points]

[Order Now]

Writing Mechanics
Instructions

Please proofread your assignments before submission. Points
will be deducted for spelling, grammatical and formatting errors
as well as APA violations and poor originality. Plagiarized
papers will be rejected and reported to Academics. [20 points]

RSCH 600 Graduate Research Methods Prospectus Assignment

RUBRIC Excellent Quality 95-100%   Introduction 45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Literature Support 91-84  points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Methodology 58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. Average Score 50-85% 40-38 points More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. 83-76  points There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. 52-49  points The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Poor Quality 0-45% 37-1 points The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. 75-1 points There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. 48-1 points There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. RSCH 600 Graduate Research Methods Prospectus Assignment Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/

RSCH 600 Graduate Research Methods Prospectus Assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!