Risk Management and Quality Management Case Study

February 10, 2023

Risk Management and Quality Management Case Study

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Risk Management and Quality Management Case Study

THE CASE STUDY IS ATTACHED IN THE WORD DOC

After reading the quality assurance manager’s report, senior management asked the following questions. What are the project risk management processes as described in the PMBOK® Guide? Explain why a project manager, or any stakeholder, should not view risk planning for projects as only a negative activity? Did the organization follow due diligence regarding the creation of a risk management plan, assess all major risks, and develop appropriate risk responses and a plan for monitoring risks? Explain your rationale. Should the risk event have been identified in the beginning by practicing sound quality control? Why or why not with details? What are some contingency plans or actions that could have been taken to limit the impact of this possible risk event and other such related events, such as a key team member leaving for any reason? Is there a quality management component that should be considered (If so, discuss what it entails)? What would be your quality assurance recommendations for such projects in the future based on this case? Management is upset that there is an occurrence of a major risk that could affect the project.

Your job is to prepare a 5- to 8-minute narrated PowerPoint presentation that addresses the six questions posed by senior management and reflects your research and thorough analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of the case. You must have a title slide where you introduce yourself and present all resources at the end of your presentation. Your references should be in APA format. Also, your presentation must be professional; therefore, bullets should be brief; you should not have big paragraphs or long sentences; you should utilize the notes section; if images are used, they should be relevant to your presentation; font size and style should be consistent; and grammar must have high priority.

[Order Now]

Risk Management and Quality Management Case Study

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.