Risk Assessment Report

February 8, 2023

Risk Assessment Report

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Risk Assessment Report

Risk Assessment Report. This is the main focus. I have attached the Ransomware Scenario parts for reference and they are numbered 1-4. The Risk assessment materials are uploaded as “Risk Assessment considerations”.

Based on the Ransomware attack scenario, conduct a risk assessment.

Produce a meaningful report for management to determine the best course of action to prevent or mitigate future risks and any possible impact to future business due to permitting, licensing, annual inspections and unannounced inspections, with a timeline towards full prevention.

You can select the appropriate risk assessment approach to assess the case and present the assessment data for management to decide how to prevent future incidents.

Present all assets associated with/threatened by the ransomware attack, including the assessments of costs and the costs associated with downtime.

Calculate risks associated with the ransomware attack.

Present the risk in a hybrid risk assessment approach to include both qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Include a risk mitigation approach /Courses of Action for management to consider.

Incorporate legal and regulatory issues in your assessment.

Include your recommendation to leadership on how to respond to this ransomware attack based on your assessment of cost/benefit. Remember to include details based upon your role in this course.

Present your rationale with supporting details on cost and benefit of risk mitigation recommendation

[Order Now]

Risk Assessment Report

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.