Review Three Types Of Management Systems

November 26, 2022

Review Three Types Of Management Systems

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Review, Three, Types, Of, Management, Systems

[Order Now]

Unit VIII Journal

Weight: 2% of course grade

Grading Rubric

Instructions

Part I: Review three types of management systems that could be used for occupational safety and health at a facility with which you are familiar. Reflect on which of the management systems you believe would be the most effective for providing a healthy, safe workplace. Support your opinion with your reasoning for the choice.

Part II: How will you use what you learned in this course in your professional career?

Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.

answer the following questions

USe internet and identify a recent EHS report about occupational accident case occurred between 2015-2020, in which poor ventilation play the primary role. Provide me the following information: company name, how many workers affected (deaths and or illnesses), what hazards, why ventilation is a primary problem, and website or article link.

2-Please list the hazards producing during abrasive blasting that need/ can be controlled using ventilation.

3-According to OSHA regulation, if the wheel (or disc) diameter for grinding, polishing, and buffing operations is increased, how should the minimum exhaust volume be changed? (Hint: table G 4-4)

4-Please define exhaust ventilation system

5-What is the ANSI Z9.2 that is adopted by OSHA?

6-Please define respirable dust

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Review Three Types Of Management Systems

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.