Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
? Write one paragraph on the background of the business. (What industry the retail store is active in, which firms are its main competitors, etc.). Make sure that you include the address of the store on top of the assignment.
? Describe the layout of the store with as much details as possible in one paragraph (where products are placed, what is the first thing people see when they enter the store, etc.) In one paragraph, explain why you think the layout is designed so. Why do you think they have some brands/products in one section of the store and some in the other sections?
? Select two people other than yourself (Preferably strangers, if you could not find any, you can go with friends) who visit that store, as well, and interview them. In your interview, make sure you get information about their general purchase behavior (how often they go shopping for that particular product, do they go alone or with someone else, etc.), why they visit that store, how they feel about it, etc. Then summarize your interviews in one paragraph. You are not expected to have the transcript of the interview in your report, just the findings and key points of each interview. (Make sure you talk about the demographics of the people you interview: age, education, gender, etc.)
? Based on the interviews, background information, and your general observations, provide some suggestions to the retail store management in one or two paragraphs. Remember, your suggestions must be based on the previous sections of the report and not on some general suggestions.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/