Resilience Theory Family Case Study Discussion

November 28, 2022

Resilience Theory Family Case Study Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Resilience Theory Family Case Study Discussion

[Order Now]

Resilience Theory

Unlike many theories, the resiliency theory changes or expands as more and more research reveals the processes by which individuals, families, and groups experience resilience when faced with adversity. Please use the assigned readings and use the Library to research peer-reviewed studies to support your post.

Please respond to the following:

Identify the key constructs of the resiliency theory.

Discuss how this theory is different from other theories in human services (such as Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs or Erikson’s developmental theory).

Given the chance to no longer refer to the resiliency theory as a theory, what would you call it and why? Be creative.

[Order Now]

Please read the following journal articles:

van Breda, A. D. (2018). A critical review of resilience theory and its relevance for social work. Social Work, 54(1), 1-18. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.libauth.purdueglobal.e…

Wang, J. L., Zhang, D. J., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2015). Resilience theory and its implications for Chinese adolescents. Psychological Reports, 117(2), 354-375. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.libauth.purdueglobal.e…

Abend, G. (2008). The meaning of ‘theory’*. Sociological Theory, 26(2), 172-200. Retrived from https://search-proquest-com.libauth.purdueglobal.edu/central/docview/213335349

Resilience Theory Family Case Study Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.