Research on Signature Assignment

December 16, 2022

Research on Signature Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Research on Signature Assignment

Research, Signature, Assignment

Firstly: this is a “Signature Assignment” for M.P.P.A program, specific to this course

Finalized Literature review (4-5 pages): both the Background & Purpose of Study (which I already did and you have to follow the style and finish the rest of it don’t delete anything of it you have to edited the RED part only and understand the BLUE part which is the professor comments on each red part)

Finalized Research Question(s)

Finalized Data Sources

Finalized Hypothesis

Finalized definitions of all variables that are included in your hypotheses

Conceptual definitions: what your variable represents based on theory. In other words, what you are trying to measure?

Operational definitions: how you will actually measure your variable. In other words, what metric(s) will you use?

Refined & finalized Data Analysis: name the type of data you’ll collect, and what statistical tests you might use to analyze it, software, etc.

Refined & finalized Sampling Design / Case Selection: how you will sample from a population or select participants, or which locations (cities, schools, etc.) you are choosing to study

Refined & finalized Instruments: examples of specific survey or interview questions – this should connect back to your operational definitions

Refined & finalized Limitations

Step-by-step Process of Research Methods (outline or bullets ok, less than 1 page)

Will include 20-25 References from scholarly sources (which I find 5 of it on my literature review and you have to find 15 more , you have to find the article that I got my source in that paper , you have to but my 5 article sources that I find and the 20 that you will include it in One PDF File because the professor need copy of all the sources in file)

Notes on “Scholarly Sources”:

Scholarly sources including in the paper and scholarly peer-reviewed articles

Websites such as Wikipedia or History.com are NOT scholarly sources, nor are they acceptable for academic work at this level.

Newspaper and magazine articles can be used to supplement your scholarly sources but do not count to that number.

Governmental reports and non-governmental reports can be counted in some cases but should not make up the majority of your scholarly sources.

there is a sample how it should the paper be look like (only as example don’t copy or quote anything from it Please)

second: Final Research Design and presentation

You will be expected to create 10-15-minute presentation (including Q &A) of your Final Research Design and present it to the class in the final week(s) of the class. You should use PowerPoint (or another program).

third:

there is

PowerPoint show you how the presentation should be! just

[Order Now]

Research on Signature Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.