Regulation of Hazardous Wastes by RCRA Project

December 15, 2022

Regulation of Hazardous Wastes by RCRA Project

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Regulation of Hazardous Wastes by RCRA Project

Regulation, Hazardous, Wastes, RCRA, Project

The deposition of hazardous and nonhazardous wastes into the environment has become an issue of concern around the world. With increased industrialization and urbanization around the world, the trends in environmental conservation needs are worrying. There are different bodies which are tasked with environmental regulation and conservation.

There are bodies which are tasked with the regulation of hazardous and nonhazardous wastes in United States. Some of the acts which regulate the deposition of hazardous and nonhazardous wastes in United States include Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). RCRA regulates how wastes should be managed in order to avoid any potential harm to the environment and to the people (Nanda & Berruti, 2021).

RCRA creates a framework to ensure that both hazardous and nonhazardous wastes are well managed. RCRA deals with the management of solid wastes into the environment. This makes RCRA a key regulation in protection of the environment and its conservation.

RCRA has its own legacies. These legacies are working to a large percentage. The reduction of in release of hazardous wastes into the environment in United States. Between the years 2007 and 2019, the rate if release of hazardous wastes in the air reduced by 57% with that of release into the surface water and soil reducing by 16% and 21% respectively (EPA, 2021).

Additionally, there is a substantive reduction in the amount of non-hazardous solid wastes which are released into the environment every year in United States. This makes the environment cleaner and more favorable and accommodative to human beings and other animals. This shows that there are positive impacts that are being driven by the use of RCRA regulations in environmental protection.

Regulation of Hazardous and non-hazardous solid wastes by RCRA is a topic of interest to the class and to myself. Every country in the world is fighting to reduce the release of wastes into the environment and to reduce the rate of pollution. Over the past years, there has been an increase in global cases of diseases attributed to hazardous wastes.

Hazardous wastes cause skin irritation and skin diseases, difficulties in breathing as well as headaches and other types of diseases (Sjöberg & Xu, 2018). These diseases can be prevented by ensuring that the legacies of RCRA are promoted and that the policies are fully implemented.

Additionally, the deposition of solid wastes into water bodies and the environment results into environmental pollution which degrades the soil and kills aquatic animals if deposited into water bodies.

It is thus a matter of concern to understand the regulations which govern the process of release of wastes into the environment and the consequences which people face for faulting these regulations. The class would thus be interested in understanding the RCRA regulations and how they work. They would also be interested in knowing if there are merits achieved from these regulations.

The topic is not easy to find comprehensive results on and this is why it has not been fully explored. There are standards of reportable incidences of hazardous release into the environment.

As a result, not all hazardous releases are made public or are reported under RCRA and thus, finding the exact data on the level of effectiveness of these acts and whether the legacies are fully working or not is not easy. More companies are coming up with mechanisms of handling hazardous wastes, some which are not yet deemed as being fully effective.

References

EPA. (2021). Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Laws and Regulations

Retrieved From: https://www.epa.gov/rcra

Nanda, S., & Berruti, F. (2021). Municipal solid waste management and landfilling technologies: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 19(2), 1433-1456. Retrieved From: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10311-020-01100-y

Sjöberg, E., & Xu, J. (2018). An empirical study of US environmental federalism: RCRA enforcement from 1998 to 2011. Ecological economics, 147, 253-263. Retrieved From: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.024

[Order Now]

Regulation of Hazardous Wastes by RCRA Project

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.