Reflecting On Your Development As A Public Speaker 1

Reflecting On Your Development As A Public Speaker

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Reflecting On Your Development As A Public Speaker

[Order Now]

For your final written assignment, please submit a paper reflecting on your development as a public speaker during this course.

In the paper, assess your individual growth and improvement, and conclude with a plan to build upon knowledge attained in the course. Be sure to specify strategies for further enhancing speaking skills and applying them in academic or professional settings.

Reflection papers must be 2 to 3 full pages (doubled-spaced) in length. You may employ first-person point of view to describe your personal experience.

No late submissions can be accepted.

[Order Now]

For your final written assignment, please submit a paper reflecting on your development as a public speaker during this course.

In the paper, assess your individual growth and improvement, and conclude with a plan to build upon knowledge attained in the course. Be sure to specify strategies for further enhancing speaking skills and applying them in academic or professional settings.

Reflection papers must be 2 to 3 full pages (doubled-spaced) in length. You may employ first-person point of view to describe your personal experience.

No late submissions can be accepted.

[Order Now]

For your final written assignment, please submit a paper reflecting on your development as a public speaker during this course.

In the paper, assess your individual growth and improvement, and conclude with a plan to build upon knowledge attained in the course. Be sure to specify strategies for further enhancing speaking skills and applying them in academic or professional settings.

Reflection papers must be 2 to 3 full pages (doubled-spaced) in length. You may employ first-person point of view to describe your personal experience.

No late submissions can be accepted.

[Order Now]

For your final written assignment, please submit a paper reflecting on your development as a public speaker during this course.

In the paper, assess your individual growth and improvement, and conclude with a plan to build upon knowledge attained in the course. Be sure to specify strategies for further enhancing speaking skills and applying them in academic or professional settings.

Reflection papers must be 2 to 3 full pages (doubled-spaced) in length. You may employ first-person point of view to describe your personal experience.

No late submissions can be accepted.

Reflecting On Your Development As A Public Speaker

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.