RCH520 W8 Case Studies

January 16, 2023

RCH520 W8 Case Studies

Order Number	653335323364743
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

RCH520 W8 Case Studies (2)

Quantitative Analysis – Week 8 Project Instructions:

There are two parts to this project – Part A and Part B. Select one case study from each part and follow the instructions within each. The case studies are attached and are labled by chapter.

Part A, select one of the two cases below:

Ch. 4 Linear Programming Applications in Marketing, Finance, and Operations Management

Ch. 9 Project Scheduling: PERT/CPM

Part B, select one of the two cases below:

Ch. 10 Inventory Models

Ch. 13 Decision Analysis

The project should be a minimum of four pages, plus a cover page and a reference page.

You MUST specify clearly the Chapter/Cases and titles so your instructor can identify them for grading.

The main body should clearly address all questions asked in the managerial report of the two case# 1 problems you chose. Your paper should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Please include citations to support your ideas.

[Order Now]

RCH520 W8 Case Studies

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.