Quantitative Analysis in an Organization Discussion Interactive Map

December 2, 2022

Quantitative Analysis in an Organization Discussion Interactive Map

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Quantitative Analysis in an Organization Discussion Interactive Map

[Order Now]

Presentation about SAR pass-anger network (saudi arabia railways)

Showing the following, copy paste from SAR websites or another website will not be accepted.

*Interactive* maps showing the stations.

Benefits vs. Road. Vs airlines.

Sample schedules of the trips.

Samples prices compared to other modes of transportation to different destinations

Why to use SAR instead of other modes of transportation

Embedded videos from the current videos of SAR in YouTube to have it in the presentation.

Message outline in the conclusion

Quantitative Analysis in an Organization Discussion

I need support with this Marketing question so I can learn better.

Based on examples from one of the recommended articles selected by you, the lecture notes, the text, and other sources, discuss one or several of the themes: quantitative analysis and decision making, quantitative analysis models, application of quantitative analysis in real situations, the role of computers and spreadsheet models in the quantitative analysis approach.

[Order Now]

(Select and review ONE of the following articles):

When Data Creates Competitive Advantage and When it Doesn’t, Hagiu, A., HBR 2020 January-February

Management is Much More Than a Science – The limits of Data-Driven Decision Making, Martin R., HBR, September – October 2017, pp. 129-136

How to Test Your Assumptions, Fjeld, J, MIT Sloan Management Review, 2018 Winter

The Five Steps All Leaders Must Take in the Age of Uncertainty, Reeves M., MIT Sloan Management Review, 2017 Fall

Quantitative Analysis in an Organization Discussion Interactive Map

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.