QI Plan Part l Assignment

December 1, 2022

QI Plan Part l Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

QI Plan Part l Assignment

[Order Now]

Continue to use the area of improvement selected in the Week Three QI Plan Part l assignment to complete the following section of the QI plan.

Write a 1,400- to 1,750-word paper in which you complete the following for the area of improvement:

Improvement Methodologies

Analyze each methodology you researched. Explain the pros and cons of each methodology for your chosen area of improvement.

Choose one of these methodologies for your organizational QI plan and explain why you chose this methodology over others.

Information Technology

Analyze each information technology application you researched.

Analyze how these applications will be used to help improve the area of improvement you have chosen.

Benchmarking

Analyze how benchmarks and milestones are involved in managing the use of quality indicators.

Analyze three potential benchmarks and milestones from quality indicators that could be used for your plan.

Mission, Vision, Strategic, and Operational Plans

Analyze how performance and quality measures are aligned to an organization’s mission, vision, and strategic plan in general.

Analyze how the measures are aligned with the mission, vision, and strategic plan of an organization.

Barriers

[Order Now]

Challenges

Analyze barriers that can interfere with the implementation or revision of quality measures.

Successful Implementation

Implementation

Analyze strategies to ensure successful implementation of new quality measures.

QI Plan Part l Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.