Psychology Discussion Assignment Paper

November 25, 2022

Psychology Discussion Assignment Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Psychology, Discussion, Assignment, Paper

[Order Now]

Reply to 2 people, it should be 150+ words for each. Reply to these two discussion posts. They both have different question they have answered. Reply if you agree with there decription for the question and/or your thoughts.

Reply#1

Which selection method do you think would be more beneficial for a company?

The two selection methods are compensatory and comprehensive selection. A compensatory selection balances peoples strengths and weakness to evaluate their final score. A comprehensive section is unbiased and a direct report of how well the person performs. From a company’s perspective, they would want the best overall performer. However this would eliminate a person who is very good in one field but not all of them. The company could also decide to hire people who specialize in different areas, but that could cause them to underperform in areas they don’t have more knowledge of. By hiring with compensatory methods. it would require a lot of teamwork to make sure the quality of work is adequate

Source: Works in the 21st century: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology

Reply#2

What will happen if the selection process does not reflect the actual job?

In the hiring process of big tech companies for software engineering position, the interviewers would ask questions to assess the applicants’ knowledge in data structure, algorithms, problem-solving ability, which are very important skills that a software engineer should have. But the questions are often very tedious, which makes the questions seem to be unrelated to the actual task.

This problem has led to applicants tend to grind the practice questions and still get the job even though they will not perform as well as someone with actual experience in the field but does not grind.

Would this be a problem for the companies that they have missed out on the better candidates? Or it wouldn’t be a problem since skills can be trained.

Source: https://hbr.org/2019/05/your-approach-to-hiring-is-all-wrong

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Psychology Discussion Assignment Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.