Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
1.A.C.Grayling and Michael Sandel illuminate some key problems of Western representative democracies (US and UK). What solutions do these two scholars provide to address these failures?
2.What is Henri Giroux’s thesis on the gradual decline of the US democracy into authoritarian populism? Why is President Trump not solely responsible for this problem? How can we resist racist authoritarian governance associated with the ideology of Trumpism?
3.Keeanga Yamahtta Taylor argues that Black freedom movements democratized American social life. How does a Black Feminist Marxist lens allow her to support her thesis? How do racial ideologies divide working-class consciousness and solidarity between poor people of color and poor white people?
4.Has Multiculturalism failed in the US and in the UK? This is a common debate media engaged by politicians. It is often connected to demonizing minority and migrant communities by focusing on their differences as a problem. Critically engage with this debate elaborating on Paul Gilroy’s ideas. What is Paul Gilroy’s contribution in understanding the politics of multiculturalism and racial thinking that shape polarization and the rise of populist ethnic nationalism in the US and in European democracies?
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/