Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
PSYC 101 Library Assignment – 60 points
This assignment will be used to assess students learning on the following course objectives:
Apply appropriate strategies of inquiry and exploration in order to find, evaluate, and use information ethically in the study of an issue in psychology.
Assignment Prompt
This Library assignment provides an opportunity for students to gain insights into the differences between Primary and Secondary sources and citing APA style. During the library orientation class you will be shown how to find a primary source and a secondary source through the library web-site and shown how to cite sources (both Primary and Secondary) in APA format. The written assignment must be done on a word processor, no hand written assignments will be accepted.
The steps for completing the Library assignment
After orientation to the Library web-site, choose an article on a topic that interests you. Make sure that the article is considered a PRIMARY SOURCE. This would be found in an academic journal ONLY. The author(s) must be the researcher(s) reporting on a specific study and its results. A Primary Source would include the following: a review of the literature, a description of methodology including the sample selection process, a description of the statistical analysis, and a discussion of the results.
PLEASE NOTE: (3 pts)
You may not use an abstract instead of the complete article for either source.
Your Primary Source cannot be older than 6 years, and must be at least 5 pages long!
You cannot use someone’s Doctoral or Master’s Thesis for this assignment.
Then either using the library website or another internet site, find a Secondary source article which is on the same topic as your primary source. (3 pts)
PLEASE NOTE:
Your Secondary Source cannot be older than 6 years, and must be at least 2 pages long.
Your Secondary Source must come from Psychology Today, a National magazine (Time, Newsweek) or an established paper (NY Times, Washington Post).
Having both a Primary source and a Secondary source is worth 10 points of this assignment.
The Written Assignment consists of 4 parts:
Provide a summary of both your primary and secondary sources, including why the topic of your 2 sources are appropriate for psychology. Make sure you cite both sources in your answer using APA referencing style. Paragraph must be a minimum 100 words; include word count please (10 pts).
In the first paragraph COMPARE: do a compare summary paragraph of how your Primary and Secondary sources are alike. You must discuss 2 ways the 2 sources are alike (Things like “they are both on the same topic”, “both articles” or “both have authors”, etc. are NOT appropriate). Paragraph must be minimum 120 words; include word count please! You will receive 4 points for each correct similarity. (Total 8 points)
In the second paragraph CONTRAST: do a contrast summary paragraph of how your Primary and Secondary sources are different. You must discuss 3 ways the 2 sources are different (Things like “one is longer”, “one has more references”, or “one is primary the other is secondary” etc. are NOT appropriate!). Paragraph must be minimum 120 words, Include word count please ! You will receive 4 points for each correct difference. (Total 12 pts)
On a separate page include your references. The REFERENCE PAGE should contain citations for both your Primary and secondary sources in APA format. Your References must include live links to your Primary and Secondary sources. If the links are not live, your paper cannot be graded. You will receive 8-points for APA reference page.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/