Products with Potential Risk Discussion Essay Paper

November 30, 2022

Products with Potential Risk Discussion Essay Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Products with Potential Risk Discussion Essay Paper

[Order Now]

I’m working on a marketing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Think of a product or service that you use that pose any types of risk on you. And then describe the followings:

Describe the product or service and its associated risk.
Describe how the risk affects your decision-making.
Describe how marketers of the product or service could overcome the ris

Marketing Campaign Launch at Ameris Bank Essay

List the features and benefits that are unique about your product or service.

Do a Google search and compare these features and benefits with your direct competitors. Identify the benefits that set your product apart.

Decide what emotional need is being specifically met by your product or service.

Think about this from your customer’s perspective and add it to your list.

Identify aspects of your product or service that your competitors cannot imitate.

Put a star beside anything that cannot be easily duplicated, reproduced, or copied.

[Order Now]

Create phrases about your unique product or service that are short, clear, and concise.

Use the words from steps 1–3 that you singled out. Be sure they can be easily communicated and understood by your customers.

Answering your customer’s primary question, “What’s in it for me?”

Make it succinct and state it as a benefit to the customer.

Products with Potential Risk Discussion Essay Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.