Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Process Modeling Vs. Configuration Management
Assignment 2: Process Modeling vs. Configuration Management
-Work Must be ontime.
-Work must be original (Instructor will be using TURNITIN.com to check the papers).
-Work must be untracable and cannot be found on any website.
-Work must be done correctly and according to the requirements below.
-Please place the requirement above the section in the paper that it answers
Write a one to two (1–2) page paper in which you determine which is more applicable across the widest possible range of situations: process modeling or configuration management. Be sure to explain your rationale.
The format of the paper is to be as follows:
Typed, double-spaced, New Times Roman font (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides. APA format.
In addition to the one to two (1–2) pages required, a title page is to be included. The title page is to contain the title of the assignment, your name, the instructor’s name, the course title, and the date.
Note: You will be graded on the quality of your answers, the logic/organization of the report, your language skills, and your writing skills.
The assignment will be graded using the following rubric:
Outcomes Assessed | · Analyze the requirements management process in a project management context.
· Use technology and information resources to research issues in project procurement management. |
Grading Rubric for Assignment 1 — Process Modeling vs. Configuration Management |
Criteria | 0 Unacceptable |
40 Developing |
60 Competent |
80 Exemplary |
1. Determine which is more applicable across the widest possible range of situations: process modeling or configuration management. | Did not complete the assignment or did not determine which is more applicable across the widest possible range of situations: process modeling or configuration management; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. Completed with less than 60% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. | Partially determined which is more applicable across the widest possible range of situations: process modeling or configuration management; omitted some key information. Completed with 60-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. | Sufficiently determined which is more applicable across the widest possible range of situations: process modeling or configuration management. Completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. | Fully determined which is more applicable across the widest possible range of situations: process modeling or configuration management. Completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Criteria | 0 Unacceptable |
10 Developing |
15 Competent |
20 Exemplary |
2. Clarity | Did not complete the assignment, or explanations are unclear and not organized. (Major issues) |
Explanations generally unclear and not well organized. (Many issues) |
Explanations generally clear and/or organized. (Minor issues) | Explanations very clear and well organized. (Added helpful details) |
3. Writing – Grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, APA usage. | Did not complete the assignment or had 8 or more different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Major issues) | Had 6–7 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Many issues) | Had 4–5 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Minor issues) | Had 0–3 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA us |
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/