Problems Identification Case Study Paper

December 10, 2022

Problems Identification Case Study Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Problems Identification Case Study Paper

[Order Now]

Problems, Identification, Case, Study, Paper

Case Study Papers should be written in the following format and must include the following subheadings:

**REQUIRED FORMAT/SUBHEADINGS FOR CASE STUDIES**

Cover page: Assignment Title (APA formatted with running head)

Problems / Issue Identification: Discuss the central facts of the case (situation or organization). Discuss the assumptions you are making about these facts or missing facts.

Analysis / Recommendations: In this section, you will respond to the key issues in the case with in-depth responses SUPPORTED BY concepts/theories presented in the textbook. If there are any questions at the end of the case study, include responses in this section.

This section must include in-text citations (references) from the textbook (or outside articles) that support your ideas, thoughts or opinions. In other words, incorporate theory from textbook/articles to support the application. THIS SECTION MUST INCLUDE ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS AT THE END OF THE CASE.

Learning Outcomes: In this section, you will discuss what you learned from the case & how you could apply this knowledge in the future.

Conclusion: Summarize any highlights and key points.

References page

“SitLed Training & Development” Case Study

You are a senior colorist at the cosmetic manufacturing company, Visage. You are also a Career Mentor for several other, more junior colorists. One of your mentees, Calista Taylor, is a colorist who is leading a project team for the third time in her 6-month career at Visage.

The first two times that she led a team, she had a lot of guidance from you-you met with her in advance of team meetings to help her plan the agenda, you took phone calls from her after hours, and you listened to her concerns when they arose. You even set up a test run of the new product for the two of you to hash out any potential problems before Calista had to try the product with the rest of her team.

By all accounts, Calista has done well communicating with her teammates, and the technologists on her teams have been receptive to her lead. Some have let you know that if there was an opportunity to work with Calista again, they would be very happy to do so. Both projects were delivered on budget and on time, with only minor issues along the way. In both cases, the customer expressed high levels of satisfaction with the Visage team, and both customers were complimentary of Calista’s skills as a team leader.

When you let Calista know that you think she is ready to run the next project team on her own (without so much hands-on support from you), she expresses apprehension. She is concerned that the project has a very ambitious time line for something so complex, so there will be little room for error. She also specifically questions how one particular member of the team, PJ, will respond to her when you are not there to back her up.

You point out that PJ is just one of the team of five and that the others are very happy to work with Calista again. You discuss the potential problems PJ might cause and reassure Calista she is “ready” for this next step. It is time for her to get out of her comfort zone and stretch a bit. She has agreed to take this next step but is still very nervous.

What type of communication do you need to maintain with Calista? \

Since Calista is at an R3 level of performance readiness, you should use leadership style S3, which will be characterized by two-way communications, active listening, encouraging her input and risk-taking, while praising her to build her confidence.

If you had to schedule potential meeting times with her in advance, how often would you be willing to meet and discuss her performance, while still taking a more “hands-off” approach this time?

What are you going to be focusing on to see Calista’s’s development progress? What areas will you be able to gather data from to provide you with information regarding her behavior?

How can you maintain your positive relationship with Calista, while still pushing her to “stretch” and grow?

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Problems Identification Case Study Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.