Pressurization System Accident

January 17, 2023

Pressurization System Accident

Order Number	6344584534574
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Pressurization System Accident

Using the NTSB Aviation Accident Database, locate an aviation related accident that involved a pressurization system failure from the last 5 years (an open source military report is acceptable, but please do not include any “privileged” data). You could also use an incident of decompression sickness/bends related to a system failure (there are several examples in the U-2 and F-18 communities). Please avoid hypoxia events as we will cover that in detail later in the course.

Next, analyze and write a case analysis that discusses the factors which resulted in the pressurization failure and explain how this pressurization failure relates to flight physiology. Support your work with a reliable source(s).

Your analysis should include the following sections:

Summary of the case

Problem Statement – What is the problem?

Significance of the Problem – Why this is a problem?

Alternative Actions (2) – How could it have been avoided?

Provide Recommendation

Guidelines

Research the given case topic and analyze using scholarly resources.

Write your analysis: target 2 pages in length, double spaced. Make sure to include a reference page (Reference and title page do not count towards the length).

You are encouraged to follow the format outlined in the Case Analysis Sample (PDF).Preview the document

Include APA citations and references (with the references listed on a separate last page).

Include information obtained from primary or secondary sources beyond those listed in the module.

[Order Now]

Pressurization System Accident

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.