Preparing Documents Using Industry Conventions

December 15, 2022

Preparing Documents Using Industry Conventions

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Preparing Documents Using Industry Conventions

Preparing, Documents, Using, Industry, Conventions

The Persuasive Email: Instructions

You practiced with persuasive email concepts prior to preparing this Assignment. For this first writing assignment, you will write a persuasive email of 500–750 words to the author of an article you find interesting in one of these publications: The New York Times, Harvard Business Review, Forbes, or The Washington Post. The article must have been published within the last 14 days.

You may select an article that you agree with, disagree with, or a combination of both. In your persuasive response, include what you liked about the article, what you disliked, what you believe should have been added, or perhaps what should not be in the article at all.

As you prepare your email, consider the audience, purpose, form, and content. Cite passages from the article in your response following current APA format for in-text citations. Include at least two additional references published within the last year that support your points. Provide a references page that includes at least three references—the article you are responding to, and the two supporting references.

Peer-reviewed academic articles, articles published in journals, textbooks, and library resources in the Purdue University Global library databases are examples of high-quality resources. Note: Wikipedia, Investopedia, and blogs etc., are not considered reliable resources for this research.

Checklist:

The persuasive email to the author of an article from one of the designated publications in the instructions should respond to the following checklist items demonstrating analysis and critical thinking:

Uses no fewer than 500, no more than 750 words, inclusive of references
Follows email conventions in fields
Addresses the intended audience in a clear and appropriate manner
Provides a clearly established, sustained viewpoint and purpose
Justifies opinion in a persuasive manner using viable references
Selects and incorporates no fewer than three credible sources
Uses correct grammar, spelling, punctuation

Minimum Submission Requirements

Proper notification of any resubmission, repurposing, or reworking of prior work per the Purdue Global Student Coursework Resubmission, Repurposing, and Reworking Policy Resource .
You must address all checklist items.
Your writing should be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful.
Your submission must be written in Standard English and demonstrate exceptional content, organization, style, spelling, grammar, and mechanics.

If the work submitted for this competency assessment does not meet the minimum submission requirements, it will be returned for revision. If the work submitted does not meet the minimum submission requirements by the end of the term, you will receive a failing score.

Plagiarism

Plagiarism is an act of academic dishonesty. It violates the University’s Code of Student Conduct, and the offense is subject to disciplinary action. You are expected to be the sole author of your work. Use of another person’s work or ideas must be accompanied by specific citations and references. Whether the action is intentional or not, it still constitutes plagiarism.

[Order Now]

Preparing Documents Using Industry Conventions

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.