Premises opposing School Uniforms
Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Premises opposing School Uniforms
Running Head: SCHOOL UNIFORMS 1
SCHOOL UNIFORMS 3
Topic: School Uniforms
Institution
Name
Topic: School Uniforms
The topic chosen for the purpose of the pre-writing is school uniforms (Procon.org, 2018). In my opinion, all students should wear school uniforms. This is arguably the best decision that any school board or administration can make. Enforcing mandatory of compulsory school uniforms in school helps cut down on crime in school, and helps the student to become more attentive during class hours since they do not have to worry about what the next student is wearing. Mandatory school uniforms also take the pressure off the parents because they do not have to keep up with clothing trends for the satisfaction of their child.
Premises opposing School Uniforms
The Procon.org website presents three premises under the con section which oppose my position (Procon.org, 2018). These premises include;
I find this premise interesting because students can still express themselves freely while wearing school uniforms. This premise is not true considering that students can do different fashion trends such as different hairstyles, stand out as achievers as well as have vibrant attitudes while wearing school uniforms.
In the event that I believed this premise, I would notice that my mind is not open on the notion of freedom of expression. This is because uniforms have nothing to do with how students exercise their freedom. Most people are more comfortable and confident when in uniforms than when they are in home clothes.
This notion can only be true if the uniforms came with basic rules such as a uniform hairstyle and language among other factors that directly restrict how students express themselves. Otherwise, I do not believe that there are any other conditions that this idea is true. This is because the ways that a student can express themselves while wearing a uniform are still the same than when they wear general clothes.
This premise presents a compelling argument because it presents facts. This is because mandatory school uniforms align students to given standards, rules and laws that have been compiled together by the school board and management.
In the event that I believed the assertions of this premise, I would agree with the conformity part only. However, I remain against the individuality part. Individuality is as a result of a student’s personality as opposed to school uniforms. The uniforms are not factors that can determine or define individuality of a student.
This premise is only true under the condition that the uniform expects them to change their behavior and conform to a given identity. Otherwise, a uniform does not in any way define their individuality. Students define their individuality through their personalities and identity.
It is important to note that this view is not helpful. What is interesting about the premise is the fact that it is false; school uniforms do not affect or in any way influence the promise of receiving free education. In other words, it makes free education worthwhile by improving student behaviors as well as cost-effective.
Most parents would agree on uniforms because it helps save money spend on trends and fashion. Similarly, students in private schools have to pay mandatory fees for uniforms. It is therefore important to note that the amount spends on regular clothes for public schooling is more than the expenses of buying a uniform. This premise assumes that school uniforms in public schools are discriminative, which is not the case (Baumann & Krskova, 2016). Students still enjoy free education but this time in uniforms.
If this premise was to be believed, I would be open enough to notice that the entire debate over uniforms affecting the concept of free education should not even be the issue at hand. This is because there are other major concerns some of which are partly resolved by uniforms that critiques of the idea should be addressing (Baumann & Krskova, 2016). Some of this includes the inclusivity concept where no child should be left behind or issues where a student is passed from level to level without having to do their homework.
Under no circumstance do I find this statement to be true. There is nothing free in this world. There is always a price or sacrifice that we have to pay to achieve a given benefit. In this concept free education comes with mandatory uniforms. This is not a price per say but a way to ensure that free education remains free for the parent too considering that school uniforms are cheaper than the regular clothes. In the same context, students can wear their home clothes when they are out of school (Baumann & Krskova, 2016).