Preliminary Internet Research Essay Discussion

December 3, 2022

Preliminary Internet Research Essay Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Preliminary Internet Research Essay Discussion

[Order Now]

Preliminary, Internet, Research, Essay, Discussion

Preliminary Internet Research

You will post only once in a 250-word response. You are not graded on any responses to classmates. You can access the Journal textbox by going to the assignment tab and choosing the Unit 2 Journal Dropbox, and you will see the textbox located there. You may have to scroll down past the grading rubric.

You read about forecasting demand for a product in Chapter 3. Based on the Unit 2 Looking Ahead ASG scenario regarding auto-warming gloves, do some research on this product using the Internet to determine what the market might be. You can search by product and then choose a location on the tab at the top of the page in statista.com.

Determine the total market demand for the gloves per the scenario.

What areas of the U.S., Canada, and Europe would you target first for your initial marketing efforts to promote glove sales? Explain.

Resources:

International Trade Administration (n.d.). Research center. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.trade.gov/

Michigan State University (1994-2019). Globaledge: Global insights. https://globaledge.msu.edu/

Statista (2016, November 22). U.S. retail sales of snow sports apparel accessories 2014-2016 . Statista Research Department. https://www.statista.com/statistics/737816/retail-…

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Preliminary Internet Research Essay Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.