Predictive Analyses in SPSS Project Essay Paper

November 30, 2022

Predictive Analyses in SPSS Project Essay Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Predictive Analyses in SPSS Project Essay Paper

[Order Now]

WHAT TO DO
Predictive analyses in SPSS

WHICH DATABASE

Go to Canvas MKTG470-06-Fall2021 ? PAGES ? SPSS STUFF ? Click on Database 3 (Political Issues database) to download it. The database will automatically open in SPSS (“.sav” file).

WHAT TO DELIVER

Saved output with interpretations of analyses typed into it. If you click “insert” it allows you to insert text boxes into the output window, where you can type your interpretation of each analysis. Once you have completed all your analyses (each accompanied by a typed interpretation), save your output file and drop this output file (not the actual database! The output file!) as the “assignment” on BB.

ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS:

** IF ONE PREDICTOR IN A MULTIPLE REGRESSION MODEL IS NOT SIGNIFICANT, MAKE SURE TO TRIM THE MODEL AND RUN IT AGAIN **

** ALSO MAKE SURE YOU ALSO CHECK THE VIF OF EACH MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS**

Is there an effect of people’s level of education on their agreement with the statement “samesex”? If so, explain what the effect means, in detail. If not, explain why not.

Is there an effect of people’s age on how much money they spend on food monthly? If so, explain what the effect means, in detail. If not, explain why not.

[Order Now]

Does people’s agreement with the statements “enviroregul” and “withdrawparis” predict how people will respond to the statement “publictransport”? If so, explain what the effect means, in detail. If not, explain why not.

Does people’s age and income have an effect on their agreement with the statement “borderwall”? If so, explain what the effect means, in detail. If not, explain why not.

Does people’s age, their family size, and their level of education impact their agreement with the statement “singlepayerhealthcare”? If so, explain what the effect means, in detail. If not, explain why not.

Predictive Analyses in SPSS Project Essay Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.