Practical Difficulties in Determining the Probabilities Of Failure

November 26, 2022

Practical Difficulties in Determining the Probabilities Of Failure

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Practical, Difficulties, Determining, Probabilities, Failure

[Order Now]

Fault Tree Analysis:

What are the practical difficulties in determining the probabilities of failure for data used in Fault Tree Analysis? How do companies calculate this data and are the methods to assist used in industry currently.

Assessment Environmental Technology

3 question Assessment, please see attachment

Introduction From the discussion of water pollution and water treatment in Unit II, we now transition to analyzing piping systems. This lesson begins with a presentation of fundamental hydraulic principles and then goes deeper into piping systems for water distribution and sanitary sewers. Hydraulics refers to the study of water, either stationary or flowing.

An understanding of hydraulics is integral to environmental technology. Environmental technology deals with treatment of pollution for the purpose of a better and safer environment. Water distribution piping is needed to deliver safe, drinkable water from a drinking water treatment plant to customers.

Following water use, sanitary sewer piping transports dirty water from customers to a wastewater treatment plant. A wastewater treatment plant treats water so that it can be discharged to the environment—typically to a river.

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Practical Difficulties in Determining the Probabilities Of Failure

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.